It seems that with the ambiguities (below), Pakatan has to respond to the questions about Sarawak Report, Lim Guan Eng and DAI Sodomy 1
The Malaysian Observer
When it comes to the DAP-led Pakatan opposition, there are unanswered questions that still linger in Malaysian’s minds:
1 Why Pakatan Harapan’s Muslim leaders have not rebuked Clare Newcastle-Brown over her slander against Datuk Hadi Awang?
It is no secret that Clare Rewcastle-Brown, the editor and chief of Sarawak Report is no stranger to publishing fabricated stories about the Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Najib Razak) of Malaysia. Her DAP-led opposition backers in turn herald her articles as the gospel truth as they 100 percent agree with her lies and falsifications.
Such unwavering belief in their (DAP-led Pakatan) paid news (SR) portal also means that the DAP-led Pakatan opposition agreed with what Clare Rewcastle-Brown had written about PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang; that he accepted a bribe.
Evidently they agree with Clare Rewcastle Brown’s article because as of today they have not come out and condemned it. In other words their silence implies agreement. So if they (DAP-led Pakatan) obviously see Datuk Seri Hadi Awang as somehow corrupted, then why are they still trying to bring him along with PAS back into the fold?
Here is another question
2 Why Pakatan Harapan has not demanded Lim Guan Eng to step down as Penang Menteri Besar?
During the period when Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng, Tun Mahathir and all those in the ANC coalition thought they had momentum on their side with respect to 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB); there was no shortage of calls from them for the Prime Minister to step down. Those calls from what eventually became the DAP-led opposition came even with the absence of evidence.
However, even though more evidence has come to light against Penang Menteri Besar Lim Guan Eng than has ever been brought against Najib, Pakatan Harapan hypocritically has not called for Lim Guan Eng to step down while the case is ongoing. They have elected to remain silent on the issue or to say that it is some government plot to silence dissent.
Here is a question that Datuk Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and many Malaysians need an answer to.
And that is ….
3. Why Mahathir has to date not come and said that Anwar Ibrahim is not guilty of Sodomy 1?
Datuk Wan Azizah Wan Ismail’s husband has been charged not once, but twice for having committed unnatural (sodomy) acts with a member of the same (male) sex. Instead of demanding Tun Mahathir set the record straight on Sodomy 1 and say that it did not take place, she has welcomed Mahathir into the DAP-led opposition fold.
Is it possible that her head is still be spinning from her Al Jazeera debacle.
Either she is still suffering from PIS (Post Interview Syndrome) or there is a promise in place to pardon Datuk Anwar Ibrahim provided that she does not make waves about Tun Mahathir and PPBM joining DAP led Pakatan.
There is still another possibility; and that is she knows that that her husband imprisonment is valid. If she pushes against Mahathir too hard, it may force him to reveal some hard evidence that he may have stored for a rainy day.
Could having hard evidence be one of the reasons why Mahathir does not feel the need to apologize for his actions?
What is clear is that Tun Mahathir with all of his handshaking with Anwar has never said that the latter was not guilty of sodomy or that he is not an immoral man.
On the contrary, the self proclaimed ‘Top Dogs’ silence over the issue only proves that his position and views about Anwar’s guilt for which he was imprisoned the first time and morality has not changed.
It seems that with the above ambiguities, Pakatan has to respond to the questions about Sarawak Report, Lim Guan Eng and DAI Sodomy 1.
Source: The Malaysian Observer